Toward Pragmatically Naturalized Transcendental Philosophy of Scientific Inquiry And Pragmatic Scientific Realism

  • Sami Pihlström

Abstract

This paper seeks to show that the turn toward local scientific practices in the philosophy of science is not a turn away from transcendental investigations. On the contrary, a pragmatist approach can very well be (re)connected with Kantian transcendental examination of the necessary conditions for the possibility of scientific representation and cognition, insofar as the a priori conditions that transcendental philosophy of science examines are understood as historically relative and thus potentially changing. The issue of scientific realism will be considered from this perspective, with special emphasis on Thomas Kuhn's conception of paradigms as frameworks making truth-valued scientific statements possible and on Charles S. Peirce's realism about "real generals".
 

References

Andersen, H. (2001). On Kuhn, Wadsworth, Belmont.
Dewey, J. (1929). The Quest for Certainty: A Study on the Relation between Knowledge and Action, G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Friedman, M. (2001). Dynamics of Reason, CSLI Publications, Stanford.
Friedman, M.(2002). Kant, Kuhn, and the rationality of science, Philosophy of Science 69: 171–190.
Friedman, M. (2003). Kuhn and logical empiricism, in T. Nickles (ed.), Thomas Kuhn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 19–44.
Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1993). Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, Harvard University Press.
Järvilehto, L. (2011). Pragmatic A Priori Knowledge: A Pragmatic Approach to the Nature and Object of What Can Be Known Independently of Experience, Sami Pihlström PhD thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy.
Kant, I. (1781/1787). Kritik der reinen Vernunft.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kuhn, T. S. (2000). The Road since Structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lewis, C. I. (1923). A pragmatic conception of the A Priori, The Journal of Philosophy 20: 169–177.
Margolis, J. (2010). Pragmatism’s Advantage: American and European Phi­losophy at the End of the Twentieth Century, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Peirce, C. (1992–1998). The Essential Peirce, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Pihlström, S. (1998). Pragmatism and Philosophical Anthropology: Under­standing Our Human Life in a Human World, Peter Lang, New York.
Pihlström, S. (2003). Naturalizing the Transcendental: A Pragmatic View, Prometheus/Humanity Books, Amherst.
Pihlström, S. (2004). Recent reinterpretations of the transcendental, Inquiry 47: 289–314.
Pihlström, S. (2008). How (not) to write the history of pragmatist philoso­phy of science?, Perspectives on Science 16: 26–69.
Pihlström, S. (2009). Pragmatist Metaphysics: An Essay on the Ethical Grounds of Ontology, Continuum, London.
Pihlström, S. (2011a). Morton White’s philosophy of culture: Holistic prag­matism and interdisciplinary inquiry, Human Affairs 21: 140–156.
Pihlström, S. (2011b). The problem of realism, from a pragmatic point of view: On the contextuality of scheme-(in)dependence in pragmatism, in R. Frega (ed.), Pragmatist Epistemologies, Lexington Books / Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Lanham, pp. 103–126. Pihlström, S. (ed.) (2011c). The Continuum Companion to Pragmatism, Con­tinuum, London.
Pihlström, S. and Siitonen, A. (2005). The transcendental method in the philosophy of science, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 36: 81–106.
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Putnam, H. (1990). Realism with a Human Face, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging Science: How to Understand Its Practices Philo­sophically, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Rouse, J. (2002). How Scientific Practices Matter: Reclaiming Philosophical Naturalism, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Rouse, J. (2003). Kuhn’s philosophy of scientific practice, in T. Nickles (ed.), Thomas Kuhn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 101–121.
Sharrock, W. and Read, R. (2002). Kuhn: Philosopher of Scientific Revolu­tions, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Vihalemm, R. (2011). Towards a practical realist philosophy of science, Baltic Journal of European Studies 1: 46–60.
White, M. (1956). Toward Reunion in Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
White, M. (1986). Normative ethics, normative epistemology, and Quine’s holism, in L. Hahn and P. Schlipp (eds), The Philosophy of W. V. Quine, Open Court, La Salle.
White, M. (2002). A Philosophy of Culture: The Scope of Holistic Pragmatism, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Published
2013-01-20
How to Cite
PIHLSTRÖM, Sami. Toward Pragmatically Naturalized Transcendental Philosophy of Scientific Inquiry And Pragmatic Scientific Realism. Studia Philosophica Estonica, [S.l.], p. 79-94, jan. 2013. ISSN 1736-5899. Available at: <http://www.spe.ut.ee/ojs/index.php/spe/article/view/spe.2012.5.2.06>. Date accessed: 17 oct. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.12697/spe.2012.5.2.06.

Keywords

realism, naturalism, pragmatism, scientific realism, transcendental philosophy, Kuhn